What Do You Need To Know About Juan Monteverde?

Juan Monteverde is an attorney who is based within New York City and is the co-founder and managing partner of Monteverde & Associates PC. His practice is a national legal firm that focuses on issues that are important to investors as well as consumers. The firm frequently represents shareholders in situations where they have incurred financial loss as a result

of corporate fraud or misleading advertising. The firm has a long history of excellent work and has had success in cases that were contested at levels up to even of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Juan Monteverde often handles cases in which he advocates for shareholder rights. This includes a variety of high-profile mergers where he sought to increase shareholder value. He also regularly works to enhance mergers in representation of his customers.

Mr. Monteverde offers his opinions on a variety of topics at the request of clients or when the situation warrants his opinion. issue of public concern. The work has included frequent speaking engagements at ACI, PLI, ABA as well as other conferences that center on executive compensation or mergers. He has also written a lot of work in the form of articles related to executive compensation and securities litigation.

Juan Monteverde has been selected by Super Lawyers as a New York Metro Rising Star in Securities Litigation and has been named by Martindale-Hubbell as an top-rated lawyer. He graduated with a B.S. in finance from California State University Northridge. He received his J.D. from St. Thomas University School of Law where he was awarded in the class of cum the laude.

Biography

Monteverde & Associates PC securities and consumer class action lawyers are headed by Juan Monteverde who has been a prominent lawyer who has fought for rights of shareholders. He. Monteverde regularly handles high-profile merger cases seeking to maximize shareholder value. He has also recovered damages and improved merger transactions during the process.

Mr. Monteverde has also broken new boundaries when it comes to challenging proxies that deal with compensation matters post-Dodd Frank Act for failing to provide accurate information required to shareholders to vote in a manner that is informed. Knee v. Brocade Comm'ns Sys., Inc. No. 1-12-CV-220249. Slip op. in 2 (Cal. Super. Ct. Santa Clara Cnty. Apr. 10, 2012) (Kleinberg, J.) (enjoining the shareholder vote of 2012 due to the fact that certain information regarding the expected executive compensation (as in connection with an increase in equity plan shares that had a potential dilutive impact on shareholder shares) was not adequately stated in the proxy statement).

Mr. Monteverde has written articles regarding executive compensation and also frequently speaks at ABA, PLI, and other conferences regarding the litigation surrounding mergers or executive compensation concerns.